Has the Time Come for Cognitive Remediation in Schizophreniaã¢â‚¬â¦again

Introduction

Schizophrenia is frequently accompanied by neuropsychological deficits which are spread across a wide range of cognitive functions (Heinrichs and Zakzanis, 1998; Keefe and Harvey, 2012). Retention and attending problems in concert with social cognitive impairments (Fett et al., 2011) are a major predictor for disability and depression functional upshot in the disorder (Greenish, 1996; Green et al., 2004; Lepage et al., 2014). Neurocognitive deficits are also a gamble factor for poor symptomatic outcome. Showtime, memory problems beal medication non-adherence as patients may neglect to remember the rationale for drug administration or forget to take their medication (Moritz et al., 2013b), peculiarly due to prospective memory failure (Moritz et al., 2004). In addition, compromised attending, reasoning, and memory capacity may limit the comprehension and internalization of knowledge and skills acquired during cognitive therapy and thus impede transfer to everyday life.

The causes underlying neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia are multi-facetted. Apart from early (neurodevelopmental) deficits that already manifest prior to the onset of the disorder (Bang et al., 2014; Corigliano et al., 2014), avolition/lack of effort and a restricted not-challenging environment/hospitalization may compromise knowledge. Some recent studies suggest that (conventional) antipsychotics impair brain functioning (Ukai et al., 2004; Ho et al., 2011; Gasso et al., 2012), which in plow hampers neurocognition. While antipsychotic-induced cognitive deficits are clearly not-desired and thus normally considered a side-effect, there is emerging, albeit not yet conclusive, show that such secondary cognitive deficits may in fact be 1 mechanism through which antipsychotics reduce positive symptoms ("effect by defect" hypothesis; Moritz et al., 2013a). In other words, at that place may be two sides of the same money: dubiousness and reduced speed of information processing induced past antipsychotics may exist a prerequisite for the dissolution of delusions.

Currently, there is a famine of potent handling options against cognitive deficits. Early on claims that atypical neuroleptics may human action equally cognitive enhancers have non lived upward to its expectations (Keefe et al., 2007; Davidson et al., 2009; Keefe and Harvey, 2012). Singular neuroleptics leave cognition uncompromised at best. It should as well be taken into account that side effects such as extrapyramidal symptoms (Fervaha et al., 2015) and concomitant medication, specially anticholinergic drugs (Vinogradov et al., 2009) and tranquilizers/benzodiazepines (Deckersbach et al., 2011) are known to beal neurocognitive deficits, too.

Cognitive remediation (CR) has shown some promise; meta-analyses bespeak that CR exerts a (small-to-moderate) effect on neurocognition (McGurk et al., 2007; Wykes et al., 2011) just does non have a lasting impact on symptomatology (Wykes et al., 2011). However, this promising evidence has to be weighed confronting the effort that needs to be invested to produce those changes (e.grand., i-on-one training, tailored textile). Recently, low-threshold group CR trainings take shown some beneficial consequence. A meta-analysis on 36 studies reveals that Integrated Psychological Therapy (IPT), a program at the interface of neurocognition and social knowledge, exerts pregnant positive effects relative to control interventions on neurocognition, social noesis, psychosocial functioning, and negative symptoms (Roder et al., 2011). In a recent study nosotros were able to show that a CR group improved attention afterward 3 years relative to a metacognition grouping (Moritz et al., 2014c).

Autonomously from "cold" cerebral deficits mirroring brain dysfunction in psychosis, particularly in the frontal and temporal lobes, there is an emerging interest in cerebral biases. Cognitive biases are non deficits per se but stand for alterations or styles in the perception and processing of information, for example a preference to remember positive versus negative information. Cerebral biases are not pathological as such; some cerebral biases can even promote psychological well-being (east.m., self-serving bias, "Pollyanna effect"; Bentall, 1992; Pohl, 2004). Among other cognitive distortions, studies accept implicated jumping to conclusions (Garety et al., 1991) and overconfidence in errors (Moritz et al., 2003) in the formation and maintenance of psychosis. To summarize, a plethora of studies suggest that patients with schizophrenia are hastier in gathering data (for reviews, encounter Garety and Freeman, 1999, 2013; Fine et al., 2007) and are more than confident in erroneous responses pertaining to memory (Moritz and Woodward, 2006a; Gaweda et al., 2012; Peters et al., 2013) and social cognition (Kother et al., 2012; Moritz et al., 2012b) relative to non-clinical and psychiatric controls. Recent evidence suggests that this extends to perception (Moritz et al., 2014b). Both biases foster the formation of momentous simulated decisions that under some contextual factors may promote delusions (Moritz and Woodward, 2006b; Garety and Freeman, 2013). To illustrate, jumping to conclusions may atomic number 82 a person with a history of psychosis to infer that a friend who is not calling dorsum within 2 days has turned his back on him and is not trustworthy anymore. This along with overconfidence in errors may later turn the initial benign suspicion into a serious false conventionalities (e.g., that the friend is a police spy who has gathered sufficient information confronting the patient so that they can terminate surveillance). Once such ideas take systematized, judgments are usually non validated or questioned anymore and the person is no longer open up to disconfirmatory testify, the latter representing some other prominent cognitive bias (Woodward et al., 2006, 2008; Veckenstedt et al., 2011).

The present report examined the efficacy of CR training versus a CR preparation combined with a bias modification approach. To this stop, a low-threshold online CR training called mybraintraining Professional person (from here on "mybraintraining") was administered. Mybraintraining intends to amend neurocognitive performance by training iv major faculties: calculation, logic, memory, and vision. We set upward two experimental CR conditions which were tested against a waitlist control group. In the standard CR status, patients were encouraged to avert making errors when performing cognitive tasks that were presented under time restriction. In the metacognition-augmented CR condition the same exercises were presented merely patients additionally had to rate their responses in terms of confidence, that is, whether they were certain or not that their responses were correct. Whenever a discipline made a loftier-confident mistake and/or an error committed with very curt reaction time (i.e., less than one-half of the allocated time used) they were advised to attenuate their confidence and to accept more time if non fully confident for the remaining trials. The aim of this metacognition-augmented CR condition was to sensitize participants to the disadvantages of high-confident and hasty controlling suggesting that "gut feelings" may be faulty. We hypothesized that the conventional CR condition may amend subjective and peradventure even objective cognitive damage. The metacognition-enhanced CR condition was hypothesized to additionally improve the jumping to conclusions bias and to attenuate response confidence (as measured by a memory task).

Materials and Methods

Participants

The present written report was approved by the ethics committee of the German Society for Psychology (DGPs). Participants were recruited from various sources. A total of 223 quondam patients of the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (Germany) with verified diagnostic condition (schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder) were informed well-nigh the study via email. All participants had given explicit permission to be contacted for future studies. Furthermore, 309 emails were sent to clinicians request them to pass on information near the study to patients meeting inclusion criteria. Finally, upon the approval of webmasters study invitations were posted in several guided cocky-aid net networks pertaining to schizophrenia and psychosis (these websites provided reliable information on the disorder and fostered the exchange of individuals affected with psychosis).

The following inclusion criteria were applied: age between 18 and 65 years, willingness to provide electronic informed consent and to participate in bearding (cyberspace-based) surveys too as a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective psychosis.

All posts and emails contained a weblink directing interested parties to the baseline survey. The trial was created using Questback ^® which does not shop IP addresses. Group allotment was carried out at random.

The first folio of the online survey essentially repeated the information of the electronic mail (random assignment to either the mybraintraining standard version, metacognition-augmented mybraintraining, or waitlist control group; inclusion criteria) in everyday linguistic communication. It was announced that all participants would receive free admission to the online program (mybraintraining) for one year, either immediately or after a half-dozen-week filibuster. Moreover, all completers would receive a manual containing mindfulness exercises at the end of the report.

Multiple log-ins via the same computer were prevented by means of "cookies." The survey consisted of the following parts: invitation, informed consent (mandatory), optional consent to contact the patient'southward clinician in club to verify diagnostic status (to do this, participants had to provide their own name also as the name and address of the clinician), demographic section (e.grand., gender, historic period), medical data (e.yard., medication, psychiatric diagnoses), cess of psychopathology I (see questionnaire section beneath), encoding memory phase, assessment of psychopathology II (run across questionnaire department below), memory recognition examination, fish task (jumping to conclusions), and request for an email address (to match baseline and post survey data). Then, nosotros asked participants to endorse whether or not they had responded honestly. Finally, participants were given the opportunity to leave comments.

No monetary compensation was offered for participation. Individuals who were randomly assigned to the waitlist status were informed that they would receive access later completing the follow-up survey six weeks subsequently.

Participants in ii experimental groups were given admission to 1 of two versions of mybraintraining within 24 h. This email likewise contained information about the rationale of mybraintraining or metacognition-augmented mybraintraining. Participants in the experimental groups received weekly email reminders encouraging them to apply the programme on a regular basis.

Procedure

6 weeks after the baseline assessments, participants were invited via email to participate in the post survey. Up to ii reminders were dispatched in case subjects failed to complete the post assessment. Iii months later the mail service assessment, invitations for a follow-up assessment were sent. Over again, up to two reminders were dispatched if subjects did non fill out the final assessment.

Post Assessment

For the post survey, individuals were requested to enter their electronic mail address to allow matching post data with baseline data. The post assessment consisted of the post-obit parts: introduction, current treatment and medication, assessment of psychopathology I, encoding retention phase, assessment of psychopathology Ii, memory recognition test, fish test (jumping to conclusions), and evaluation of the online training (see below). Similar to the baseline assessment, we asked participants whether or not they had responded honestly and gave them the opportunity to leave comments.

Subsequent to completion of the mail service assessment, all participants received a transmission on relaxation and mindfulness exercises. Participants in the waitlist condition as well received admission to the standard CR condition. Patients in the standard mybraintraining status did not receive the metacognition-augmented CR training and vice versa.

Follow-Up Assessment

Iii months later the mail service assessment, participants were invited to a follow-upwardly assessment. This final assessment was not role of our initial report blueprint. Equally participants in the waitlist grouping received access to the mybraintraining standard version subsequent to completion of the mail assessment, this terminal follow-up cess did not let comparison of the iii groups. Hence, the follow-up analysis compared the standard CR grouping (immediate or delayed) with the metacognition-augmented CR grouping. As an incentive for continued participation, individuals received a manual with exercises derived from "Acceptance and Commitment Therapy." The follow-up assessment was a shorter version of the postal service assessment and involved a selection of previously used scales (encounter below). As the follow-up was not announced from the start, we expected a higher non-completion rate.

Questionnaires (Online Assessment)

Participants were asked to complete the following questionnaires (the survey proceeded only after all items had been answered):

Paranoia Checklist (Freeman et al., 2005)

The Paranoia Checklist is an 18 detail questionnaire assessing paranoid beliefs and suspiciousness. The psychometric properties are good (Freeman et al., 2005; Lincoln et al., 2010a,b). In our slightly adjusted version, participants are asked to charge per unit their present symptom severity on a v-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely).

Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D)

The Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Low Scale (CES-D) is a 20 item questionnaire covering depressive symptoms; the reliability and validity of the CES-D accept been established previously (Radloff, 1977; Hautzinger and Brähler, 1993). In the present study, CES-D items were presented intermixed with items from the Paranoia Checklist.

Launay-Slade Hallucination Scale-Revised (LSHS-R; Bentall and Slade, 1985)

The Launay-Slade Hallucination Calibration-Revised (LSHS-R) is a 16 detail questionnaire covering sleep-related hallucinations, vivid daydreams, intrusive thoughts, and auditory hallucinations. Its reliability has been demonstrated elsewhere (Goodarzi, 2009). Psychosis patients with hallucinations normally score higher than remitted patients, and the latter in turn attain higher scores than patients who never experienced hallucinations (Varese et al., 2012). The LSHS-R was non included in the follow-upward cess.

Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS) – Extended

The Beck Cognitive Insight Calibration (BCIS; Beck et al., 2004) is a 15-item scale that measures the degree of patients' self-reflectiveness and overconfidence in the interpretation of experiences. Main component analysis (Beck et al., 2004) suggests a ii-dimensional construction (self-reflectiveness and self-certainty). According to the original article (Beck et al., 2004), the BCIS demonstrates skillful convergent, discriminant, and construct validity. The psychometric properties of the German language translation used in the present written report are good as well (Mass et al., 2012). We complemented the BCIS with a number of self-developed novel items asking for subjective cognitive deficits (e.g., "I take problem learning new things"). The BCIS was not administered in the follow-upwards cess.

Jumping to Conclusions

We administered an online version of the probabilistic reasoning task (Speechley et al., 2010; Moritz et al., 2012a), which slightly differs from the original beads chore as it employs a different scenario (lakes with fish instead of jars with beads). Three parallel versions were set to avert do effects. In each version, two lakes with colored fish in opposing likelihood (east.g., 80% orange vs. xx% gray fish, and vice versa) were presented to the participant. Following each "grab," participants were asked to make two judgments: (ane) a probability judgment almost the likelihood that the fish was/were being caught from lake A versus lake B, and (two) whether the available corporeality of data would justify a determination or non. The instruction emphasized that the fisherman would not change the lake throughout the task. The ratio of fish in each lake was shown at the bottom of each slide along with previously caught fish (the last catch was indicated with an arrow). In total, 10 fish were presented; i lake was strongly suggested past the concatenation of events (D–D–D–North–D–D–D–D–North–D; D = dominant colour of fish; North = non-dominant colour of fish). Jumping to conclusions was defined as a conclusion after 1 or ii fish. Nosotros also computed the number of draws to decisions.

Retentivity Test

3 parallel versions of a newly developed retentiveness recognition test were composed. The test was modeled later the Auditory Exact Learning Memory Exam (AVLT) but did not encompass active recall. In the (incidental) encoding stage (i.eastward., unlike in the AVLT participants were not instructed that their later chore would be to memorize the items), participants were presented xv nouns [each five words that were pre-classified past the authors as positive (east.one thousand., block), negative (e.thou., accident) or neutral (due east.chiliad., table)] and requested to appraise each substantive as either positive, neutral or negative (valence). Later, participants were presented the previously presented 15 words intermingled with fifteen distractor words of different valence in random order (recognition phase). Participants were asked to rate if the respective give-and-take had been presented before (i.eastward., in the valence job) and how confident they were in the correctness of their judgment. Items had to exist endorsed on a 4-indicate Likert scale (ane = former word, sure; two = old word, uncertain; 3 = new discussion, uncertain; four = new word, certain). There was an equal number (northward = 15) of (pre-defined) negative, positive, and neutral words, both with respect to old (studied) and new (distractor) words.

Mybraintraining Professional

Mybraintraining is a CR program which is available online (no local installation on PC necessary) at http://www.mybraintraining.com/. The program can exist used both equally a self-help or conventional treatment device (i.e., guided treatment by neuropsychologist or occupational therapist). The program encompasses 30 exercises aimed at stimulating executive functioning. Exercises fall into four wide categories: calculation, logic, memory, and vision. The exercises were designed during development of the "Train your Brain with Dr. Kawashima" plan in cooperation with the Industry University Research Project with Professor Dr. Ryūta Kawashima. According to the developers (personal communication), performance of each do had to exist accompanied by activation of the frontal lobe (presented in the "Scientific Details" part of each exercise).

The difficulty of the sessions automatically adapts to the patients' performance. mybraintraining includes motivating elements as used commonly in video games in order to increase fun and adherence. The administrator can define individual training plans and accommodate exercises to each patient'due south needs (e.g., level of difficulty, varied time limits, etc.). This tool also compiles statistics (east.g., to compare i patient with reference group, number of sessions completed, training success). Data protection and security comply with industry standards.

For the present study, we used the "daily examination" tool of mybraintraining Professional person which encourages patients to perform a random cord of iv exercises, one from each category (calculation, logic, memory, and vision).

In addition to the conventional version of mybraintraining Professional, a condition termed metacognitive-augmented CR condition was constructed, which aimed to reduce overconfidence and jumping to conclusions. This version asked participants to make a confidence judgment (certain versus uncertain) after each trial. The program then provided feedback in case of hasty and/or high-confident errors (see Effigy 1). Since the termination of the report, this additional option is at present part of the standard plan.

FIGURE 1. Case for an do from category "Logic." The participant had to identify the young of the parent animals (the upper left response option is correct). In the standard version, the participant had to bespeak his or her choice and was then informed nearly the outcome (correct versus incorrect). In the metacognitive-augmented condition, the participant was asked later on each response whether he or she was sure that the response was correct. In case of a very fast incorrect response (less than half of the allotted time indicated by the time bar; see bar left to clock symbol) or a high-confident incorrect response, patients were encouraged by automatic feedback to either take more fourth dimension before completing an detail and/or to attenuate response confidence if the available evidence was insufficient.

Strategy of Data Analysis

Uncomplicated cantankerous-sectional analyses were performed using t-tests for metric (e.thousand., age) and cross table statistics for nominal data (e.chiliad., gender distribution). For group comparisons over fourth dimension we used mixed ANOVAs with Grouping as the betwixt-subject gene and Time every bit the within-subject factor when using metric data. In instance of binary data (eastward.grand., rate of jumping to conclusions) a generalized estimating equations process was performed which was accounted more appropriate than a conventional repeated-measures ANOVA.

Results

Table ane shows the baseline characteristics of the sample, of which 76 patients could be reached for the mail service assessment and 38 for the follow-up. No meaning differences emerged for any demographic, psychopathological, or cognitive variable.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the full sample. Means, SD, (in brackets) and frequency.

Across fourth dimension, medication status did not change between groups (p > 0.3). At baseline, 87% of the participants were medicated with antipsychotics, at post (85%) and follow-upwards (87%) the charge per unit was nearly identical. Likewise, treatment status [aye (i.e., outpatient, inpatient, day clinic, practitioner) versus no] did not change between groups beyond fourth dimension (p > 0.5). Virtually patients were treated as outpatients (pre: 60%, post: 57.5%, follow-upwardly: 53.3%). Rates did not differ among groups at whatever point in time (p > 0.half dozen).

Pre versus Postal service

Table 2 shows between-group differences from pre to post for the per protocol sample (i.eastward., participants in the CR conditions had logged into mybraintraining at least once). Groups did non differ significantly on whatever symptoms, and cognition measures.

TABLE 2. Differences among weather across fourth dimension (sample with available pre–post scores).

Pre versus Follow-Up

At follow-up, 38 individuals underwent another assessment [metacognition-augmented mybraintraining: north = 14; standard mybraintraining (firsthand or delayed): northward = 24]. For draws to decision, the effect of time achieved statistical trend level, F(1;36) = 3.46, p = 0.071, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.09, while the group event was insignificant, F(ane;36) = two.44, p = 0.127, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.06. This was qualified by a significant interaction, F(one;36) = v.82, p = 0.021, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{ii}}$ = 0.14; Figure two shows that participants in the metacognition-augmented condition showed delayed controlling while participants in the standard condition showed a tendency toward more than jumping to conclusions. As well, using generalized estimating equations to fit a repeated-measures logistic regression to jumping to conclusions data (decision after fish i or 2), a meaning interaction occurred favoring the metacognition-augmented status, Wald χ^two(1) = 4.55, p = 0.033.

Figure 2. Patients who underwent the metacognition-augmented cerebral remediation program (MC-MBT) showed less jumping to conclusions from baseline to follow-up (upper) and delayed decision-making (lower) relative to participants who received the standard version (MBT; immediately or delayed), respectively.

For the number of high-confident responses on the retention test the effect of time, F(one;36) = 5.12, p = 0.030, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.125 simply not grouping, F(1;36) = 0.eleven, p = 0.737, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ < 0.01 were significant, which was qualified by significant interaction at an almost large effect size, F(1;36) = 5.59, p = 0.024, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{two}}$ = 0.thirteen. Equally can be seen in Effigy 3 the number of high-confident responses remained stable in the standard CR grouping but declined in the metacognition-augmented group.

Figure three. Patients in the metacognition-augmented cognitive remediation condition (MC-MBT) attenuated confidence ratings from baseline to the follow-upwards menstruation relative to the standard CR grouping (MBT).

No pregnant interaction emerged for depression, F(i;36) = 0.14, p = 0.91, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ < 0.01, paranoia, F(1;36) = 0.64, p = 0.428, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.02, hits, F(ane;36) = 0.78, p = 0.785, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ < 0.01, and faux memories, F(i;36) = 1.23, p = 0.276, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.03.

Retrospective Assessment (Mail)

Feasibility and comprehensibility of the training were rated high past respondents and did non differ between the ii CR conditions (Table 3). Patients were able to perform the tasks lonely and rated the exercises as helpful, although merely a minority reported symptom improvement.

Tabular array three. Retrospective subjective cess ("fully applies" and "rather applies" were combined) at post.

Correlations betwixt Performance and Adherence with Symptomatology

We examined whether adherence and progress on the CR programme impacted result variables. Progress in performance in CR memory exercises (slope change measure) was correlated at r = 0.61 (p = 0.026) with comeback in the memory examination from pre to post for the standard mybraintraining group (no other variables turned significant). Gain in overall functioning (all exercises combined) in the metacognition-augmented mybraintraining status correlated with more draws to decision in the fish chore, r = 0.54, p = 0.021 and less jumping to conclusions at trend level, r = -0.42, p = 0.079. Similarly, the number of exercises performed (objective measure) in the metacognition-augmented mybraintraining status correlated with less jumping to conclusions significantly (r = -0.398, p = 0.040) and less draws to decision over fourth dimension at tendency level (r = 0.353, p = 0.071). Adherence in the standard condition (number of days the CR program was used) was associated with reduction of depression over time (r = 0.467, p = 0.028). Also, number of exercises performed (objective) was correlated with refuse of depressive symptoms (r = 0.482, p = 0.023), over again for the standard version simply.

Examination–Retest Reliability of the Data and Plausibility Checks

Examination–retest reliability was determined for pre–mail scores only due to the low number of participants at follow-up. Consistency of the psychopathological scales was excellent (CES-D: pre–post: r = 0.817, p < 0.001; Paranoia Checklist: r = 0.891, p < 0.001, LSHS-R: r = 0.936, p < 0.001). The recognition test showed low reliability from pre to post (r = 0.255, p = 0.024). The correlation betwixt subjective adherence (number of days exercises were performed: 0–7 days/week) and objective number of exercises performed (data extracted from log files) was adept (r = 0.817, p < 0.001).

Discussion

The written report ready out to examine the effectiveness of conventional as well as metacognition-augmented CR training. Almost patients were on antipsychotic medication and in outpatient handling. Treatment status did non change substantially across time. Special precautions were taken to verify diagnostic condition. Speaking for the quality of the information, the test-retest reliability of the questionnaires was very high. Further, subjective and objective adherence were highly correlated.

We used a low-threshold online CR training termed mybraintraining targeting four cognitive domains which according to the developers (personal communication, unpublished data) are linked with metabolic changes in frontal lobe areas. Patients carried out the exercises on their home reckoner. The programme was delivered unguided; no private adaption was performed apart from automatic adjustments pertaining to difficulty. Our hypotheses were partly confirmed. Group comparisons indicate that conventional CR did not affect any outcome measure suggesting that cold cognitive performance is quite resistant to cerebral grooming interventions, at least in a rather chronic and subacute psychosis population. At the same fourth dimension, the CR version showed some interesting correlations with depression: the number of completed sessions was correlated with a reduction on the CES-D which could hint at (but is no proof for) the possibility that preparation improves well-beingness. This would be a potentially of import finding as neither antipsychotic (Leucht et al., 2009) nor antidepressant medication (Kishi and Iwata, 2014) exert substantial furnishings on depression in psychosis. As well, psychotherapy with cerebral-behavioral therapy only yields a small-to-medium effect according to a meta-analysis (Wykes et al., 2008). Notwithstanding, an opposite causal relationship cannot be fully dismissed: Improvement of well-existence may enhance fidelity to perform the tasks. Farther, performance gains on the memory task were correlated with improvements on the objective retentiveness exam, speaking for the ecological validity of the chore. Again, however, grouping differences were not significant.

At follow-upwards, the metacognition-enhanced CR training yielded the expected significant furnishings on the JTC bias (i.e., delayed determination-making) and reduced overconfidence. These findings are noteworthy since both biases are implicated in the germination of psychosis and JTC is rather resistant to change (Ross et al., 2011; And so et al., 2012a,b). This delayed effect is interesting and may point that the newly acquired skills need some time to settle before they become manifest. At post, nosotros constitute substantial correlations betwixt fish task parameters with adherence and functioning proceeds.

At showtime sight, the results are sobering in confront of recent reviews indicating that CR tasks may yield at least small-to-medium effects on objective neurocognitive functioning (McGurk et al., 2007; Wykes et al., 2011). A number of factors may have prevented the hypothesized blueprint of results from emerging. First, the training was cocky-paced, that is, individuals were encouraged to perform the tests daily but in fact many did not perform the tasks on a regular ground. In contrast, in many clinical trials on CR in that location are frequent appointments and homework is checked past therapists. A certain (cued) participation frequency may be necessary to show an effect. Our weekly email reminders may not have been sufficiently potent cues. Second, the group was not severely ill (mainly outpatient handling) and cocky-help was performed predominantly at home as patients were not hospitalized. A chronic and more remitted sample is likely to show less benefit from grooming than an astute and hospitalized sample (east.g., because of regression to the hateful). Thus, a first-episode and CR-naive handling group may show better outcome. Third, the outcome measures did non cover the full range of domains targeted. In fact, we had only one objective retention test with rather depression reliability. Perhaps the training exerted effects on functions not covered past our battery. Future studies should therefore administrate a wider range of behavioral tests. Finally, while the initial sample was rather large and we had a adept retentivity rate for the mail phase, less than l% participated in the follow-up.

Decision

The metacognition-enhanced CR condition showed delayed changes on two prominent cognitive biases which are implicated in the pathogenesis of positive symptoms: jumping to conclusions and overconfidence. The program nether investigation now incorporates these additional metacognitive features which are deemed important every bit prior studies advise that JTC is quite resistant to change (see above) and is not only tied to positive symptoms just predicts functional consequence to some degree (Andreou et al., 2014). Information technology seems that the grooming – like metacognitive grooming (MCT; Moritz et al., 2014a) – successfully "sows the seeds of uncertainty." Farther studies should investigate whether this leads to a reduction of symptoms in the long run.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absenteeism of whatever commercial or financial relationships that could exist construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Andreou, C., Treszl, A., Roesch-Ely, D., Kother, U., Veckenstedt, R., and Moritz, South. (2014). Investigation of the role of the jumping-to-conclusions bias for curt-term functional outcome in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 218, 341–347. doi: x.1016/j.psychres.2014.04.040

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bang, Yard., Kim, G. R., Vocal, Y. Y., Baek, S., Lee, E., and An, Due south. M. (2014). Neurocognitive impairments in individuals at ultra-loftier risk for psychosis: who will really convert? Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 49, 462–470. doi: ten.1177/0004867414561527

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Beck, A. T., Baruch, E., Balter, J. M., Steer, R. A., and Warman, D. K. (2004). A new musical instrument for measuring insight: the Beck Cognitive Insight Calibration. Schizophr. Res. 68, 319–329. doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(03)00189-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bentall, R. P. (1992). A proposal to allocate happiness equally a psychiatric disorder. J. Med. Ethics 18, 94–98. doi: 10.1136/jme.xviii.2.94

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bentall, R. P., and Slade, P. D. (1985). Reliability of a calibration measuring disposition towards hallucination: a brief report. Pers. Individ. Dif. 6, 527–529. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(85)90151-5

CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Corigliano, 5., De Carolis, A., Trovini, G., Dehning, J., Di Pietro, South., Curto, One thousand., et al. (2014). Neurocognition in schizophrenia: from prodrome to multi-episode affliction. Psychiatry Res. 220, 129–134. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.07.067

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Davidson, M., Galderisi, S., Weiser, M., Werbeloff, Northward., Fleischhacker, West. W., Keefe, R. S., et al. (2009). Cognitive effects of antipsychotic drugs in start-episode schizophrenia and schizophreniform disorder: a randomized, open-characterization clinical trial (EUFEST). Am. J. Psychiatry 166, 675–682. doi: ten.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08060806

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deckersbach, T., Moshier, South. J., Tuschen-Caffier, B., and Otto, G. W. (2011). Memory dysfunction in panic disorder: an investigation of the office of chronic benzodiazepine utilise. Depress. Anxiety 28, 999–1007. doi: ten.1002/da.20891

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fervaha, G., Agid, O., Takeuchi, H., Lee, J., Foussias, G., Zakzanis, K. K., et al. (2015). Extrapyramidal symptoms and cognitive test functioning in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 161, 351–356. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.eleven.018

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fett, A. Chiliad., Viechtbauer, West., Dominguez, M. D., Penn, D. L., van Os, J., and Krabbendam, 50. (2011). The relationship between neurocognition and social cognition with functional outcomes in schizophrenia: a meta-assay. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 35, 573–588. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.07.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fine, C., Gardner, Thousand., Craigie, J., and Golden, I. (2007). Hopping, skipping or jumping to conclusions? Clarifying the office of the JTC bias in delusions. Cogn. Neuropsychiatry 12, 46–77. doi: 10.1080/13546800600750597

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Freeman, D., Garety, P. A., Bebbington, P. E., Smith, B., Rollinson, R., Fowler, D., et al. (2005). Psychological investigation of the structure of paranoia in a not-clinical population. Br. J. Psychiatry 186, 427–435. doi: 10.1192/bjp.186.5.427

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Garety, P. A., and Freeman, D. (1999). Cognitive approaches to delusions: a disquisitional review of theories and evidence. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 38, 113–154. doi: 10.1348/014466599162700

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Garety, P. A., and Freeman, D. (2013). The past and future of delusions research: from the inexplicable to the treatable. Br. J. Psychiatry 203, 327–333. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.126953

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Garety, P. A., Hemsley, D. R., and Wessely, Southward. (1991). Reasoning in deluded schizophrenic and paranoid patients. Biases in functioning on a probabilistic inference task. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 179, 194–201. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199104000-00003

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gasso, P., Mas, S., Molina, O., Bernardo, Thousand., Lafuente, A., and Parellada, Due east. (2012). Neurotoxic/neuroprotective activity of haloperidol, risperidone and paliperidone in neuroblastoma cells. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 36, 71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2011.08.010

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gaweda, 50., Moritz, S., and Kokoszka, A. (2012). Impaired discrimination between imagined and performed actions in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 195, 1–viii. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.07.035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Goodarzi, M. A. (2009). Psychometric properties of a Farsi translation of the Launay-Slade Hallucination Scale in an Iranian population. Percept. Mot. Skills 109, 911–923. doi: 10.2466/pms.109.three.911-923

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Green, K. F., Kern, R. S., and Heaton, R. K. (2004). Longitudinal studies of knowledge and functional event in schizophrenia: implications for MATRICS. Schizophr. Res. 72, 41–51. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.09.009

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Hautzinger, M., and Brähler, M. (1993). Allgemeine Depressionsskala (ADS) [General Depression Calibration]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

Google Scholar

Heinrichs, R. Due west., and Zakzanis, K. K. (1998). Neurocognitive deficit in schizophrenia: a quantitative review of the evidence. Neuropsychology 12, 426–445. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.12.3.426

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ho, B. C., Andreasen, N. C., Ziebell, Southward., Pierson, R., and Magnotta, Five. (2011). Long-term antipsychotic treatment and brain volumes. A longitudinal study of start-episode schizophrenia. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 68, 128–137. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.199

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keefe, R. S., Bilder, R. Grand., Davis, South. M., Harvey, P. D., Palmer, B. W., Gold, J. K., et al. (2007). Neurocognitive effects of antipsychotic medications in patients with chronic schizophrenia in the CATIE Trial. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 64, 633–647. doi: ten.1001/archpsyc.64.vi.633

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keefe, R. S. E., and Harvey, P. D. (2012). "Cerebral impairment in schizophrenia," in Novel Antischizophrenia Treatments. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, eds M. A. Geyer and M. Gross (Berlin: Springer), 11–37. doi: x.1007/978-3-642-25758-2_2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kishi, T., and Iwata, N. (2014). Meta-assay of noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant use in schizophrenia. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 17, 343–354. doi: x.1017/S1461145713000667

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kother, U., Veckenstedt, R., Vitzthum, F., Roesch-Ely, D., Pfueller, U., Scheu, F., et al. (2012). "Don't give me that look" - overconfidence in false mental state perception in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 196, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.03.004

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lepage, G., Bodnar, 1000., and Bowie, C. R. (2014). Neurocognition: clinical and functional outcomes in schizophrenia. Can. J. Psychiatry 59, 5–12.

Google Scholar

Leucht, Due south., Arbter, D., Engel, R. R., Kissling, W., and Davis, J. M. (2009). How effective are 2nd-generation antipsychotic drugs? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Mol. Psychiatry fourteen, 429–447. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4002136

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lincoln, T. M., Peter, N., Schafer, M., and Moritz, Southward. (2010a). From stress to paranoia: an experimental investigation of the moderating and mediating role of reasoning biases. Psychol. Med. 40, 169–171. doi: 10.1017/S003329170999095X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lincoln, T. Thou., Ziegler, M., Lullmann, Eastward., Muller, Chiliad. J., and Rief, W. (2010b). Tin can delusions be self-assessed? Concordance between cocky- and observer-rated delusions in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 178, 249–254. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.04.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Mass, R., Wolf, K., and Lincoln, T. Grand. (2012). Associations of the beck cognitive insight scale (BCIS) with poor insight, subjective experiences, and depression. Int. J. Cogn. Ther. 5, 197–210. doi: ten.1521/ijct.2012.5.two.197

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McGurk, South. R., Twamley, E. Due west., Sitzer, D. I., McHugo, G. J., and Mueser, K. T. (2007). A meta-analysis of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 164, 1791–1802. doi: x.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07060906

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moritz, S., Andreou, C., Klingberg, S., Thoering, T., and Peters, M. J. (2013a). Assessment of subjective cognitive and emotional furnishings of antipsychotic drugs. Effect by defect? Neuropharmacology 72, 179–186. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.04.039

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moritz, S., Favrod, J., Andreou, C., Morrison, A. P., Bohn, F., Veckenstedt, R., et al. (2013b). Beyond the usual suspects: positive attitudes towards positive symptoms is associated with medication noncompliance in psychosis. Schizophr. Bull. 39, 917–922. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbs005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moritz, S., Andreou, C., Schneider, B. C., Wittekind, C. E., Menon, Yard., Balzan, R. P., et al. (2014a). Sowing the seeds of doubt: a narrative review on metacognitive training in schizophrenia. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 34, 358–366. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.04.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moritz, S., Ramdani, Due north., Klass, H., Andreou, C., Jungclaussen, D., Eifler, S., et al. (2014b). Overconfidence in incorrect perceptual judgments in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. Cogn. i, 165–170. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2014.09.003

CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Moritz, Due south., Veckenstedt, R., Andreou, C., Bohn, F., Hottenrott, B., Leighton, L., et al. (2014c). Sustained and "sleeper" effects of group metacognitive grooming for schizophrenia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 71, 1103–1111. doi: ten.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1038

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moritz, South., Ferahli, S., and Naber, D. (2004). Memory and attending performance in psychiatric patients: lack of correspondence between clinician-rated and patient-rated functioning with neuropsychological test results. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 10, 623–633. doi: ten.1017/S1355617704104153

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Moritz, Southward., Van Quaquebeke, N., and Lincoln, T. K. (2012a). Jumping to conclusions is associated with paranoia merely not general suspiciousness: a comparing of two versions of the probabilistic reasoning paradigm. Schizophr. Res. Treatment 2012, 384039. doi: 10.1155/2012/384039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moritz, S., Woznica, A., Andreou, C., and Kother, U. (2012b). Response confidence for emotion perception in schizophrenia using a Continuous Facial Sequence Task. Psychiatry Res. 200, 202–207. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.07.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moritz, S., and Woodward, T. Due south. (2006b). Metacognitive command over false memories: a central determinant of delusional thinking. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 8, 184–190. doi: 10.1007/s11920-006-0022-two

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Moritz, S., Woodward, T. S., and Ruff, C. C. (2003). Source monitoring and memory confidence in schizophrenia. Psychol. Med. 33, 131–139. doi: 10.1017/S0033291702006852

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peters, Yard. J., Hauschildt, Thousand., Moritz, S., and Jelinek, L. (2013). Impact of emotionality on retention and meta-memory in schizophrenia using video sequences. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 44, 77–83. doi: x.1016/j.jbtep.2012.07.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pohl, P. F. (2004). Cerebral Illusions: A Handbook on Fallacies and Biases in Thinking, Judgement and Memory. Hove: Psychology Press.

Google Scholar

Roder, V., Mueller, D. R., and Schmidt, S. J. (2011). Effectiveness of integrated psychological therapy (IPT) for schizophrenia patients: a research update. Schizophr. Bull. 37(Suppl. ii), S71–S79. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr072

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ross, K., Freeman, D., Dunn, K., and Garety, P. (2011). A randomized experimental investigation of reasoning grooming for people with delusions. Schizophr. Bull. 37, 324–333. doi: x.1093/schbul/sbn165

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Then, Due south. H., Freeman, D., Dunn, Thou., Kapur, S., Kuipers, Eastward., Bebbington, P., et al. (2012a). Jumping to conclusions, a lack of belief flexibility and delusional conviction in psychosis: a longitudinal investigation of the structure, frequency, and relatedness of reasoning biases. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 121, 129–139. doi: 10.1037/a0025297

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

So, S. H., Garety, P. A., Peters, E. R., and Kapur, South. (2012b). Modify in delusional dimensional dimensions, reasoning biases and emotions in the offset viii weeks of antipsychotic handling. Schizophr. Res. 136(Suppl. ane), S375. doi: ten.1016/S0920-9964(12)71014-9

CrossRef Full Text

Speechley, W. J., Whitman, J. C., and Woodward, T. Southward. (2010). The contribution of hypersalience to the "jumping to conclusions" bias associated with delusions in schizophrenia. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 35, 7–17. doi: 10.1503/jpn.090025

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ukai, W., Ozawa, H., Tateno, M., Hashimoto, E., and Saito, T. (2004). Neurotoxic potential of haloperidol in comparison with risperidone: implication of Akt-mediated signal changes past haloperidol. J. Neural Transm. 111, 667–681. doi: 10.1007/s00702-004-0109-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Varese, F., Barkus, E., and Bentall, R. P. (2012). Dissociation mediates the relationship betwixt childhood trauma and hallucination-proneness. Psychol. Med. 42, 1025–1036. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711001826

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Veckenstedt, R., Randjbar, S., Vitzthum, F., Hottenrott, B., Woodward, T. South., and Moritz, South. (2011). Incorrigibility, jumping to conclusions, and decision threshold in schizophrenia. Cogn. Neuropsychiatry 16, 174–192. doi: x.1080/13546805.2010.536084

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vinogradov, S., Fisher, One thousand., Warm, H., Holland, C., Kirshner, M. A., and Pollock, B. Grand. (2009). The cognitive toll of anticholinergic burden: decreased response to cognitive training in schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 166, 1055–1062. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09010017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Woodward, T. S., Moritz, Due south., Cuttler, C., and Whitman, J. C. (2006). The contribution of a cognitive bias against disconfirmatory prove (BADE) to delusions in schizophrenia. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 28, 605–617. doi: 10.1080/13803390590949511

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wykes, T., Huddy, 5., Cellard, C., McGurk, S. R., and Czobor, P. (2011). A meta-assay of cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: methodology and issue sizes. Am. J. Psychiatry 168, 472–485. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10060855

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Wykes, T., Steel, C., Everitt, B., and Tarrier, N. (2008). Cognitive behavior therapy for schizophrenia: issue sizes, clinical models, and methodological rigor. Schizophr. Balderdash. 34, 523–537. doi: x.1093/schbul/sbm114

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

wozniakakes1997.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01048/full

Share this post